Archive for the 'Clinical trials' Category

Arch Intern Med roundup: diets, delays and disclosure

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

The journal Archives of Internal Medicine has a several cracking research papers this week. Low carb dieters are grumpier than those on low fat diets First up is Brinkworth et al.‘s research on the long-term psychological effects of low carbohydrate diets compared with low fat diets. In this study, 106 overweight and obese individuals were [...]

Nearly a third of clinical trials don’t adequately report adverse events

Monday, November 9th, 2009

A study published in Archives of Internal Medicine has found that almost a third of clinical trials reported in top medical journals don’t adequately report the side effects of the intervention being tested. Pitrou et al. assessed the reporting of safety data in 133 randomised controlled trials published between January 2006 and January 2007 in [...]

Switching from paper to patient – taking part in a clinical trial

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

I make a living reading clinical research papers and am familiar with the big picture of clinical trials – papers published, guidelines amended and practice improved.  Grassroots clinical research – the work of doctors, nurses and patients undertaking a trial – has always seemed like a million miles away to me. However, I’m hoping to [...]

Do clinical trial registries reduce selective reporting of medical research?

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

Not really, say two studies recently published articles in JAMA and PLoS Medicine that scrutinized studies in various clinical trial registries. The idea of trial registries is that researchers provide all the details of their study – such as the number of patients they need to recruit and the primary outcome (e.g. death or heart [...]

Are researchers fudging clinical trial statistics?

Friday, December 12th, 2008

Before a clinical trial can commence a protocol – a plan of exactly how a trial will be conducted – will be formulated.  As part of the planning, the individuals undertaking the trial will calculate approximately how many patients need to take part for the results to be meaningful (the ‘sample size’) and prespecify which [...]

Irresponsible reporting of clinical trials by the news media

Wednesday, October 1st, 2008

It is important for journalists to highlight any potential bias in medical research so that patients and physicians alike can judge how valid clinical trial findings are. Today the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study showing that almost half of news stories on clinical trials fail to report the funding source of [...]

Randomized control freakery

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine has recently published an interesting review article on clinical trial design – ‘From randomized trials to registry studies: translating data into clinical information‘. This isn’t a guide on how to read a clinical paper – you should have a look at Prof Trisha Greenhalgh‘s book ‘How to read a paper‘ [...]